A
Brief History of the South Carolina Accommodations Tax Bill
A
bill creating a tax on transient lodgings facilities in South
Carolina was originally introduced by state Representative Jean
Meyers in the mid-seventies. The monies were basically to go to
the state's general fund and some towards reduction of property
taxes. The state's hotel industry successfully fought the bill
as a discriminatory tax for several years. When Ms. Meyers left
the legislature, Representative Harriet Keyserling picked up the
effort and added a section which used the monies for arts related
activities.
The
bill was gaining support each year and in 1981, after studying
what other states had done, representatives of the hospitality
industry including Angus Cotton, John Curry, John David Rose and
Ashby Ward held several meetings with Representative Keyserling
to craft a bill that would provide a guaranteed amount for tourism
promotion as well as funds for appropriate arts activities.
At
that time only 16 of South Carolina's 46 counties had significant
tourism activity. The remaining 30 counties fought the legislation
claiming that there citizens would suffer by having to pay the
tax when visiting the popular coastal areas. To get their support,
the "Robin Hood" amendment was added which required
that the rich tourism areas give some funds to those not otherwise
benefiting from the tax.
The
bill that passed in 1983 gave the first $5,000 to the general
fund of the county or municipality where it was collected. 25%
of the balance was to go to a non-profit organization with a track
record of tourism promotion for marketing. An advisory committee
was required for every county and municipality that collected
in excess of $50,000 annually and the special rules established
for "high tourism impact" areas which let the remaining
funds be spent, in part, for general services above what would
normally be required if there was not significant tourism impact.
The
bill was later modified giving counties/municipalities 5% in addition
to the $5,000 and the designated marketing agency an additional
5% for a total of 30%. There have been minor modifications over
time and there is still a need for some clarification on many
issues but the tax has served us well.